The group you are posting to is a . Messages posted to this group will make your email visible to anyone on the Internet.
1.
Don S
More options
Nov 1 2003, 12:15 am
Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.8bit
From: Don S <atari104@sbcglobal.net> -
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2003 15:14:03 GMT
Local: Sat, Nov 1 2003 12:14 am
Subject: Re: Atari 1090XL and other equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
"Bruce" <No-S@Ivn.cl> wrote in
> i've been thinking on buy some of those things.. > but first i need an usa mailbox :o)
> "Bootstrap Bill" <wrcous@yahoo.com> escribió en el mensaje > ...
>> "Don Schoengarth" <atari104@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message >> ... >> > There are still a couple of days left to bid on the Atari 1090 XL >> > Expansion System. >> > Check it out along with other Atari items at:
>> Has anyone considered possibly buying one of these things so they can be >> reverse engineered and mass produced?
Where are you located? I have no problem with you bidding on the items as long as you pay the shipping costs. Don
2.
Bruce
More options
Nov 1 2003, 5:43 am
Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.8bit
From: "Bruce" <No-S@Ivn.cl> -
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2003 17:43:48 -0400
Local: Sat, Nov 1 2003 6:43 am
Subject: Re: Atari 1090XL and other equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
Santiago/Chile I guess the way of payment would be paypal
"Don S" <atari104@sbcglobal.net> escribió en el mensaje ...
> "Bruce" <No-S@Ivn.cl> wrote in
> > i've been thinking on buy some of those things.. > > but first i need an usa mailbox :o)
> > "Bootstrap Bill" <wrcous@yahoo.com> escribió en el mensaje > > ...
> >> "Don Schoengarth" <atari104@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message > >> ... > >> > There are still a couple of days left to bid on the Atari 1090 XL > >> > Expansion System. > >> > Check it out along with other Atari items at:
You may have noticed that the post you whinge about is over 5 months old, the argument has been fought and its dead and buried, so now who's stirring it.
"SgtSilicon" <foolspicedham_melbo_@...> wrote in message
...
> You must be trying to cause an argument or flame war. I much prefer > ads to flame wars for damn sure. In this age of megabit broadband (or > even modem) I don't consider his ads to be much of a problem to > dispense with. Why do you complain so about it when it's literally > milliseconds of download time?
> On Sat, 31 May 2003 10:35:49 +0000 (UTC), "Steve Sweet" > <steve.sw@btopenworld.com> wrote:
> >Oy . face
> >How come you only address your supporters, face your critics as well arse > >munch.
--
Regards, Steve S.
2.
SgtSilicon
More options
Nov 2 2003, 5:01 pm
Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.8bit
From: foolspicedham_melbo_@... (SgtSilicon) -
Date: Sun, 02 Nov 2003 08:01:52 GMT
Local: Sun, Nov 2 2003 5:01 pm
Subject: Re: ADV: Bravo Sierra want's Your Money!
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 months or not, I still stand by what I said. Your initial greeting says a lot about you I might add. You are still as enlightened as ever, so it is still a point worth making. Did that confuse you? You might want to seek some professional help for that. It's sad when IQ challenged intellects resort to anger, lashing out and cursing to try and compensate.
BTW... don't bother responding as I'm through with you until you get some help. Just get some professional psychiatric help.
On Fri, 31 Oct 2003 18:23:26 +0000 (UTC), "Steve Sweet"
>You may have noticed that the post you whinge about is over 5 months old, >the argument has been fought and its dead and buried, so now who's stirring >it.
>"SgtSilicon" <foolspicedham_melbo_@...> wrote in message >...
>> You must be trying to cause an argument or flame war. I much prefer >> ads to flame wars for damn sure. In this age of megabit broadband (or >> even modem) I don't consider his ads to be much of a problem to >> dispense with. Why do you complain so about it when it's literally >> milliseconds of download time?
>> On Sat, 31 May 2003 10:35:49 +0000 (UTC), "Steve Sweet" >> <steve.sw@btopenworld.com> wrote:
>> >Oy . face
>> >How come you only address your supporters, face your critics as well arse >> >munch.
** To email a reply, please remove everything up to and including the underscore in my email reply header.
6809
1.
Bootstrap Bill
More options
Nov 1 2003, 8:04 am
Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.8bit
From: "Bootstrap Bill" <wrcous@yahoo.com> -
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2003 23:04:51 GMT
Local: Sat, Nov 1 2003 8:04 am
Subject: Re: 6809
|
|
|
|
|
|
"Nearl J Icarus" <nj_toothenbec@...> wrote in message ...
> In article <awMnb.1933$Ub4.1@twister.socal.rr.com>, wrcous@yahoo.com > says...
> >I seem to remember a 6809 board being made for the Apple 2. Plus, there was > >a Z80 card for the Color Computer, also a very different CPU from the 6809. > >Are you sure this couldn't work?
> They made Z-80 cards for the Apple ][. All it does is make the Apple a dumb > terminal for the software you're running on the Z-80, like CP/M. Which CoCo, > IIRC, only the CoCo III used the 6809.
All Color Computers used the 6809, though some have been upgraded with 6309's
5 1/2 inch floppy disks
1.
Jeremy Bell
More options
Nov 1 2003, 11:50 am
Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.8bit
From: iquit@collegeclub.com (Jeremy Bell) -
Date: 31 Oct 2003 18:50:26 -0800
Local: Sat, Nov 1 2003 11:50 am
Subject: Re: 5 1/2 inch floppy disks
|
|
|
|
|
|
I was reading about those sio-2-pc cables on the net, and I came across something called a 1050-2-PC cable. The atari drive I have is a 1050. Should I get that instead? What's the difference?
jeremy
2.
Docrotcod
More options
Nov 1 2003, 12:06 pm
Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.8bit
From: "Docrotcod" <rahb@cox.net> -
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2003 21:06:42 -0600
Local: Sat, Nov 1 2003 12:06 pm
Subject: Re: 5 1/2 inch floppy disks
|
|
|
|
|
|
The 1050 to PC allows you to hook your Atari disk drive to your pc to copy, create images, and whatnot. It doesn't allow you to interface to your 8bit. I would start with sio2pc and use the Ape software from Steve Tucker.
Thomas
"Jeremy Bell" <iquit@collegeclub.com> wrote in message
...
> I was reading about those sio-2-pc cables on the net, and I came > across something called a 1050-2-PC cable. The atari drive I have is > a 1050. Should I get that instead? What's the difference?
> jeremy
3.
Mo
More options
Nov 1 2003, 9:43 pm
Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.8bit
From: "Mo" <m@atariland.com> -
Date: Sat, 01 Nov 2003 12:42:52 GMT
Local: Sat, Nov 1 2003 9:42 pm
Subject: Re: 5 1/2 inch floppy disks
|
|
|
|
|
|
The 1050toPC cable is a hundred times more useful to me. It makes quick work of making real floppies to use on your 8 bit. Honestly, I hardly ever use my SIO2PC cable. APE has a utility to use the 1050 to PC (also known as Prosys cable), at least the old DOS version does- I don't know about the windows version. If given a choice, I would stick with the 1050toPC cable. Mo
"Docrotcod" <rahb@cox.net> wrote in message
...
> The 1050 to PC allows you to hook your Atari disk drive to your pc to copy, > create images, and whatnot. It doesn't allow you to interface to your 8bit. > I would start with sio2pc and use the Ape software from Steve Tucker.
> Thomas
> "Jeremy Bell" <iquit@collegeclub.com> wrote in message > ... > > I was reading about those sio-2-pc cables on the net, and I came > > across something called a 1050-2-PC cable. The atari drive I have is > > a 1050. Should I get that instead? What's the difference?
> > jeremy
4.
Keith Vandewark
More options
Nov 2 2003, 8:42 am
Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.8bit
From: k@madbbs.com (Keith Vandewark) -
Date: 1 Nov 2003 15:42:48 -0800
Local: Sun, Nov 2 2003 8:42 am
Subject: Re: 5 1/2 inch floppy disks
|
|
|
|
|
|
iquit@collegeclub.com (Jeremy Bell) wrote in message <>... > I was reading about those sio-2-pc cables on the net, and I came > across something called a 1050-2-PC cable. The atari drive I have is > a 1050. Should I get that instead? What's the difference?
> jeremy
Hi Jeremy,
I refer you again to my previous post regarding this subject. Nick Kennedy also developed the 10502PC cable and describes it's construction and useage at this site: <>